Loved this description of the new digital life we lead from an introduction to an article about The-Dream written by Sasha Frere-Jones in the New Yorker.
One way to understand social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace is to consider that younger digital natives are not necessarily being exhibitionists when they post photographs of themselves and share personal details there. Instead, these users are living a life in which consciousness is spread out evenly over two platforms: real life and the Web. Rather than feeling schizophrenic or somehow pathological, digital natives understand that these two realms divide the self much as speech and the written word divide language, a division that humans have lived with for a long time without going bonkers
Based on some new research I've seen lately, I think there is an increasing unification of behavior and thinking between the mobile and 'wired' world as well.
According to www.recovery.gov, yesterday was the first day that federal agencies in receipt of recovery (which I suppose is how we're trying to brand the stimulus these days--well done) funds start to be obligated to report in a transparent manner how the money is being spent.
The site is pretty basic (I've copied the mission statement below) but I'm very interested in seeing how it evolves, as promised, over time. As people can interact with the site and how the money is flowing I hope that not only will it have a positive effect on limiting waste, but also almost a placebo effect on making us all feel that something is changing for the better.
Perhaps this degree of transparency + accountability should be added to Andrew Cuomo's lessons from yesterday's post?
Our Mission
Education: Explain the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act;
Transparency: Show how, when, and where the money is spent;
Accountability: Provide data that will allow citizens to evaluate the Act’s progress and provide feedback.
Read the rest of the mission statement after the jump.
Perhaps as inspiring as President-elect Obama's election and message of change has been his campaign's ability to execute along the way. As much as change, his candidacy and prospective presidency (now no longer prospective) have been about the possibility of competence we believe in and need.
The campaign was as professionally and well run in so many ways, as many others have documented along the way. So will it continue?
If this site launched hours after the election was final is any indication, you ain't seen nothing yet. Let's hope so.
I could quibble and say that the functionality isn't quite there. That it's no My Starbucks Idea or Member's Project but it's a great start.
This post from Renny Gleeson over at Wieden hits the nail on the head.
As he puts it:
It seems to boil down generally to this:
"digital" shops tell you "traditional" shops don't get (meaning, of course, 'understand' or 'do well') "digital", "social media", "viral marketing", or a host of specific functionalities - e.g., SEM, SEO, mobile development, etc., etc., etc.
"traditional" shops tell you "digital" shops don't "get" "branding", "craft", "storytelling", or "advertising".
He goes on explain a number of reasons, all contradictory and all true. The problem? Both types of agencies are right and both are wrong.
A few thoughts on why this is just a blip on the path to the dissolution of the distinctions that make an agency ‘traditional’ or ‘digital.’
During any period of change there are always exceptionalists (either traditional or radical) and synthesists (traditional or radical).
It’s not about the past versus the future. It’s about the extremists versus holistic thinkers. Never know who will win. It's good to be extremist, but it's even better to be the best kind of opportunist.
Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. As in love with the digital world as I am, the more I get pulled that way, the happier I am to have the tools I've learned through the years that help create big ideas rooted in human insights.
The history of ideas is the history of this tension between exceptionalists and synthesists and the resulting creation of a third, better system of the world.
All this talk reminded me of Bloom’s Taxonomy, which I’ve decided to include here, just because I can. It's a good reminder that there are different, and better, ways to approach information and what you do with it.
Back around the holidays, you may have seen one of the most requested
gifts out there. No, not the Wii or the iPhone, but
rather another fantastic product designed with only your pleasure in
mind. That's right, the iJam.
Although we're six months away from Xmas in either direction,
apparently one iJam just made it from Spain to San Francisco, no surprise thanks to Spain's
notoriously slow mail. It was
received by my friend Ezequiel Triviño, who I met through my friends and former colleagues at
Sra. Rushmore, some of the best creative minds in Spain.
Ezequiel and a friend decided this iJam didn't meet their high
standards and that they would return it to the Apple store in San
Francisco. Hilarity ensues. Check out the video here:
Full disclosure: Ezequiel is a great creative mind, has won and
forgotten about more creative awards than most see and the the founder
of Wikreate, which is in its first six months as they describe it is:
Wikreate is a new model of a 360 advertising and
communications agency structured as a social network of skilled
professionals and partner agencies.
This founding principle is related to a lot of the thinking behind the title of this blog (a hundred avatars) and a model for the way the world has gone and continues to go: smart, well intentioned people coming together in new combinations to do things that have never been done before. New goals need new models, right?
I'm looking forward to seeing the work they do for clients with slightly larger budgets than the iJam. But if Spain wins on Thursday and Sunday for Euro 2008, I definitely want one.
Check out the post, but ideas like 'digital buttons should not be like real ones' remind us that as technology changes, the cues we can use to persuade people to act differently should change accordingly. New technology creates the potential for new experiences. Let's make them, instead of copying the old.
The WSJ covered a study in the New England Journal of Medicine today (WSJ here and NEJM here regarding obesity and here regarding smoking) that goes a long way in validating the power of recommendation and influence within a social network.
The Framingham Study, which has been tracking the health of nearly 13,000 Framingham MA residents since 1948 was also informally keeping track of their social networks and family relations. In the last few years the two data sets (health and relationships) have been combined and have led to some interesting findings.
It comes as no great surprise that social networks impact behavior and the choices individuals make. And even though I'm sure I'm coming to my own conclusions based on this data, I do think it adds more validation for the power of nodes of individuals creating change and generating new ideas about how we live. Living proof of the power of the Net Promoter?
The guys who did the recent analyses (Fowler and Christakis) are apparently writing a book on how social networks operate called Connected, due in 2010.
* A random sample of 1000 subjects in 1971 and 2000.
Yellow nodes are smokers (with the node size proportional to number of
cigarettes consumed); green nodes are nonsmokers. Orange arrows denote
friendship or marital ties; purple arrows, family ties. In 1971, there
are many more smokers and they are dispersed throughout the social
network. By 2000, there are not only fewer people smoking, but they
have also been pushed to the outside of their social groups. Image and
text via UCSD
I had a much longer post planned involving a deep semiotic analysis of Noah's fun semiotic playland that is www.brandtags.net and its relationship to how changes in technology change language now that I finally had the time to read much of Professor Naomi Baron's Always On.
Not going to happen today, unfortunately.
However, in the spirit of regular posting following a hiatus spent at a early-Bond quality corporate HQ yesterday, here are the sites I've been playing with lately. They're like Q (this one, not that one) for the rest of us.
Recent Comments